🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager endured losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Over Formation and Ideology

For example, this was the director , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.