🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic discussions with Washington provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy was effective, and revealed recent overtures had been made by go-betweens to resume discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful defensively and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been destroyed. Afterward, European countries employed their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if discussions resume.

The US president recently said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the forum, designed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by military means. He said the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith challenging to restore.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and continues the final answer to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, remains in place. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this invasion."